Abmahnung Wettbewerbsrecht 


Warnings for unfair competition: eBay case study

Understand the problem through this short introduction to the UWG

The German Unfair Competition Act (UWG) is a central set of rules in German law aimed at ensuring fair and transparent competition. It addresses both businesses and consumers and ensures that business practices do not harm other market participants. The UWG encompasses a wide range of provisions designed to prevent misleading or aggressive business practices from gaining an undue advantage.

The Unfair Competition Act  is particularly important in online commerce. Platforms such as eBay, Amazon, and other marketplaces offer a wide range of opportunities for trading goods, both for private and commercial sellers. This makes it all the more important that the rules of fair competition are adhered to in order to create a balanced market environment. The UWG intervenes here by setting clear guidelines for the labeling and conduct of commercial sellers.

One of the central provisions of the UWG is the prohibition of misleading advertising. Commercial sellers may not structure their offers in such a way that they create the impression that they are private sales. Such practices can influence consumers' purchasing decisions and deprive them of important consumer rights. Furthermore, the UWG ensures that competitors who comply with the rules are not disadvantaged by unfair practices.

The law provides various legal instruments to sanction unfair conduct in the event of violations of the Unfair Competition Act. These include, among others, warnings, injunctions, and claims for damages. These measures are intended not only to protect affected competitors and consumers, but also to deter potential rule violators.

Another important aspect of the Unfair Competition Act is protection against imitation. Innovative companies that invest a lot of time and money in the development of new products and services are intended to be protected from imitators who seek to illegally profit from these innovations. This encourages companies to continue investing in innovations and thus stimulate competition in the market.

The Unfair Competition Act is subject to constant adjustments and reforms in order to respond to new developments and challenges in trade. This is particularly evident in the digital economy, where new business models and distribution channels continually raise new questions. Legislators and courts are required to monitor these developments and adapt the Unfair Competition Act accordingly to ensure fair competition in the future.

Compliance with the Unfair Competition Act (UWG) requires a high level of knowledge and understanding of the legal requirements from market participants. Training and legal advice can help avoid potential pitfalls and ensure legal compliance.

Unfair behavior on eBay

On eBay, there are repeated cases in which commercial sellers disguise their listings as private sales. This practice is not only unfair, but also violates the German Unfair Competition Act (UWG). Commercial sellers are subject to strict legal requirements, such as providing imprint, cancellation rights, and paying taxes. These regulations are intended to ensure that consumers are fully informed and can exercise their rights. By circumventing these obligations, commercial sellers gain an unfair competitive advantage over honest traders who comply with the law.

Another problem is that consumers often assume that seemingly private sellers have no professional knowledge or obligations. This can lead them to be less skeptical and conduct less research before making a purchase. Commercial sellers who declare their listings as private sales exploit this trust to sell their goods faster and more easily.

Such deception can take various forms. Often, commercial sellers claim they only sell items occasionally and that they are personal items. In reality, however, they operate an ongoing business and generate regular income from their sales. Such practices are difficult for consumers to detect, especially if the seller operates skillfully and leaves little evidence of their commercial activity.

The legal consequences for such violations can be significant. As mentioned in the case study on Attorney Schröder, affected sellers can face warnings and significant costs. These legal steps are intended to ensure compliance with the Unfair Competition Act (UWG) and protect fair competition. The warnings typically include a request to submit a cease-and-desist declaration with a penalty clause and to bear the costs of the warning. This can not only be financially burdensome for the affected sellers but can also cause lasting damage to their reputation.

To avoid such problems, commercial sellers should always provide transparent and honest information about their sales activities. This includes correctly labeling their listings as commercial and providing all necessary legal information. This includes providing a complete imprint, information about the right of withdrawal, and a clear description of the items offered. Training and legal advice can help raise awareness of legal requirements and ensure compliance with all regulations.

Fair and transparent trade benefits all market participants. Consumers benefit from clear and reliable information, while honest traders are not disadvantaged by unfair practices.

Legal consequences for sellers

Sellers who violate the German Unfair Competition Act (UWG) risk a number of legal consequences. One of the most common measures is a cease-and-desist letter, which is usually accompanied by a request to submit a cease-and-desist declaration under penalty of law. This declaration obligates the person receiving the warning to refrain from the offending behavior in the future and to pay a contractual penalty for further violations. The amount of these penalties can be substantial and result in a considerable financial burden.

In addition to the direct costs of a cease-and-desist letter, which also include the issuing party's legal fees, a violation of the UWG can also result in claims for damages. Competitors harmed by the unfair conduct can demand compensation for their losses. This includes not only direct financial damages, but also lost profits and other economic disadvantages.

Another legal tool that can be used against sellers who violate the Unfair Competition Act is an injunction. This court measure can require the seller to immediately cease business operations. An injunction is usually issued when a violation is particularly serious or rapid remedial action appears necessary to prevent further damage. Compliance with such an injunction is mandatory, and violations can result in significant fines.

In some cases, proceedings may also be initiated on the merits, in which a court makes a final decision on the legality of the contested conduct. Such proceedings are often lengthy and costly. However, they offer the opportunity to obtain comprehensive judicial clarification and, if necessary, more far-reaching measures, such as permanent injunctions or substantial damages.

A particularly drastic aspect of the legal consequences is the potential damage to reputation. Sellers who become publicly known for violating the Unfair Competition Act (UWG) can lose the trust of their customers and business partners. This can lead to a significant decline in sales and a loss of market share in the long term. Especially in times of digital networking, negative news spreads quickly and can cause lasting reputational damage.

Furthermore, non-compliance with the UWG can also have tax consequences. Commercial sellers who declare their activities as private often evade tax obligations. This can lead to additional demands from the tax authorities, which represent a further financial burden in addition to the legal consequences mentioned above.

In summary, the legal consequences for sellers who violate the UWG are significant and diverse.

Case study: Warning letters issued by lawyer RA Schröder for various companies

A well-known case that illustrates the problem of unfair competition concerns the cease-and-desist letters issued by attorney Schröder. On behalf of his clients, he takes targeted action against sellers who disguise their commercial offers on platforms such as eBay as private sales. This practice constitutes a violation of the German Unfair Competition Act (UWG) and can result in far-reaching legal and financial consequences for the affected sellers.

The cease-and-desist letters sent by attorney Schröder typically contain a request to submit a cease-and-desist declaration, subject to penalty. With this declaration, the person receiving the warning agrees to refrain from the offending conduct in the future and to pay a contractual penalty in the event of repeated violations. Furthermore, the cease-and-desist letters usually demand reimbursement of legal fees, which can be substantial depending on the scope and complexity of the case. The fees appear high, but are accepted as such by many courts.

A typical case handled by Schröder might look like this: A seller regularly offers products for sale on eBay, claiming that these are private sales. In reality, however, they are a commercial seller who uses the platform to systematically sell goods for profit. This can be demonstrated by various indicators, such as a high number of sales ratings, a steady supply of new goods, or the sale of similar products in large quantities.

The affected sellers are often surprised when they receive a warning letter from Schröder. Many are unaware of the legal requirements and the severity of their violations. They mistakenly believe that they can act as private sellers without complying with the strict legal requirements for commercial sellers. In his warning letters, Schröder explains the relevant provisions of the Unfair Competition Act (UWG) and makes it clear that circumvention of these regulations will not be tolerated.

Schröder places particular emphasis on the obligation to correctly label sales offers. This includes providing a complete imprint, information about the right of withdrawal, and a clear declaration of commercial activity. By providing false labeling, sellers gain an unfair competitive advantage by circumventing any legal and tax obligations and misleading consumers.

Reactions to the warnings vary. While some sellers promptly comply with the demands and make the necessary adjustments, there are also cases in which the recipients of the warnings deny the allegations and seek legal assistance. In such cases, legal disputes can arise, in which a judge ultimately decides on the legality of the complained behavior.

Preventive measures for sellers

Sellers on online platforms such as eBay should be aware of the importance of correctly declaring their sales activities to avoid legal disputes and warnings. A first and important step is to clearly identify listings as commercial or private. Commercial sellers must comply with all legal requirements applicable to commerce. This includes, among other things, providing a complete imprint. The imprint must include the company's full address, contact details such as telephone number and email address, and the name of the responsible person. This information ensures transparency and enables consumers to contact the seller if necessary.

Another important point is information about the right of withdrawal. Commercial sellers are obligated to inform their customers of their right of withdrawal. This means that consumers have the option of withdrawing from the purchase contract within a certain period of time without giving any reason and returning the goods. The exact duration of the withdrawal period and the conditions for withdrawal must be communicated clearly and comprehensibly. This includes providing a withdrawal form to facilitate customer withdrawal from the purchase.

The description of the items offered should be detailed and honest. Sellers should provide all relevant information about the condition, characteristics, and any defects of the goods. This builds trust and reduces the risk of misunderstandings or disappointment after the purchase. It is particularly important to clearly state any signs of wear or defects with used items.

To protect yourself legally, it can be helpful to present your general terms and conditions (GTC) transparently. Important provisions regarding payment, delivery, warranty, and liability can be included in the GTC. This provides clear guidance for both the seller and the buyer and reduces the risk of disputes.

Training courses and workshops can also be helpful for learning about legal requirements and best practices in online trading. Many chambers of commerce and industry associations offer relevant training courses to keep sellers up to date with the latest legal regulations. By participating in such training courses, sellers can not only expand their legal knowledge but also receive practical tips for everyday trading.

Close collaboration with a lawyer or specialized consultant can also be beneficial. Experienced legal counsel can help ensure compliance with legal requirements and identify potential risks early on. This is particularly important because the legal framework for online commerce is constantly evolving, and sellers must respond flexibly.

Last but not least, sellers should regularly review their sales activities and compliance with legal requirements. This can be done through internal audits or by engaging external experts. Continuously reviewing and adapting sales strategies ensures that sellers are always on the safe side and avoid potential legal issues.

By consistently implementing these measures, sellers can not only prevent legal problems but also strengthen their customers' trust and secure their market position in the long term.

Relevance of the UWG in online trading

Online commerce has grown significantly in importance in recent years, and with it the need to create and maintain fair competitive conditions. The Unfair Competition Act (UWG) plays a central role in this by defining rules and regulations designed to prevent market participants from being disadvantaged by unfair practices. An important aspect of the UWG is the clear distinction between private and commercial sellers. This distinction is essential because commercial sellers are subject to certain legal obligations designed to ensure that consumers are fully informed and can exercise their rights. This includes, among other things, providing an imprint, information about the right of withdrawal, and the obligation to pay taxes.

A common violation of the UWG in online commerce is that commercial sellers disguise their offers as private sales in order to evade the strict legal requirements. This practice leads to a distortion of competition, as private sellers are subject to fewer requirements and thus enjoy an unfair advantage. The UWG intervenes here to ensure that all sellers play by the same rules, thus ensuring fair competition.

Another key point is protecting consumers from misleading and aggressive business practices. Trust is especially important in digital commerce, where buyers often don't have the opportunity to physically inspect goods before purchase. The Unfair Competition Act (UWG) ensures that consumers receive clear and truthful information so they can make informed purchasing decisions. Deceptive statements about product features, price discounts, or the origin of goods are prohibited and can result in legal consequences.

The UWG protects not only consumers but also honest traders who comply with the legal requirements. By sanctioning unfair practices, it is intended to prevent some market participants from gaining an unlawful advantage by violating the rules. This creates a balanced market environment that promotes innovation and quality.

In times of digitalization and booming online commerce, the importance of the Unfair Competition Act (UWG) can hardly be overestimated. New business models and sales channels continually raise new legal issues. Legislators are therefore required to continuously adapt and expand the UWG to reflect current developments. This is evident, for example, in the increasing regulation of influencer marketing and the transparency of product reviews.

For market participants, compliance with the UWG not only means avoiding legal consequences, but also the opportunity to gain and maintain customer trust. Transparency and fairness are essential factors for long-term success in online commerce. Sellers who adhere to these principles can differentiate themselves from the competition and build a loyal customer base.

In summary, the UWG plays a central role in online commerce in creating and maintaining fair competition. It protects both consumers and honest retailers from unfair practices, thus contributing to a transparent and trustworthy market environment. The continuous adaptation and expansion of the law is necessary to meet the challenges of the digital economy and to ensure fair competition in the future.